Welcome to visitors from blogosphere.app and lobste.rs. This blog is a personal account of the old tech? junk? I work with on a personal basis. This is just for my own education, not to make money or anything else, and with the hope that some of the things I present here will help others in their quests to keep this old stuff going. There’s a couple of pages you may be interested in, the first is the main project hub, and the 2026 Hamfest list / show pictures page. All of these are on the sidebar, including previous years’ pictures.
Thank you for visiting. Now, on to the show:
In the last post, we determined that this device is going to need some serious corrections, aka complete rebuild, in order to be safely functional again. The previous owner, while they used decent quality parts in the unit, attached them in such a manner that I have to wonder what was going on. It’s just…what? You can find the link to that post near the bottom of this page.
Since then, I’ve acquired a few things:
A manual, essential because there’s no schematics online for this particular variant, and a pre-made kit of parts containing all of the capacitors for the device. The latter is more of a convenience thing, but it seems to be a kit of good quality parts at a reasonable, one-off price.
Speaking of schematics:
This is a 2500px-wide image, and should be decent enough to print on an 8.5×11 sheet for use.
As part of the process, I’m going to take all of the knobs off and dump them in the ultrasonic bath. But first, where is the main dial’s limit?
And they all come off easily except the binding posts.
The binding posts need to come out of the chassis to be cleaned.
I’ll unsolder those, clean them, and remount before anything else happens. The case itself, as rusty as it is, will also get a good scrub. I don’t repaint these, I like the used look.
Let’s do a quick test on one of the parts in the unit. This is the main 2.0μF “precision” measurement capacitor, and this one was replaced at some point by the previous owner. Datacode is 70s, but that doesn’t mean anything more than that’s when the part itself was made.
It’s under 2%, that’s pretty good. The new one:
That’s about 1.1%, so this one is marginally better.
The next thing to do is go through my parts and see what I have, and then order some resistors. I already have the big 500Ω 5W part, this is leftover from the Olson TE-189 Rework project. That device and this one share very similar schematics - but then again, it’s not like there were many ways to do this type of thing with line frequency and a tube…
A quick note on parts here: In tube devices, you’re often dealing with voltages much higher than you’d encounter elsewhere - this unit, for example, has 540+ VAC on the transformer output. Not only should you take caution, but you need to be aware that certain parts must have certain ratings. Capacitors, sure - but resistors as well. Take this 30kΩ resistor for example. This is R7 on the schematic, and takes the full brunt of B+. This can be in excess of 700V under the right conditions, and this will destroy a normal resistor.
It’s hard to see in this picture, but the resistor is longer than others - this is to provide more isolation between B+ and the load / ground / etc. In this case, make sure your resistor is rated properly - I’m going to use two 15k 500V devices to halve the potential on each, which should reduce risk. I’ll do a better comparison once the parts are out of the unit, including a measurement post.
I have all of the parts ordered, but the Cuyahoga Falls Hamfest is this weekend and I am going to see if I can get a few of the components there. If not, I’ll order parts and we’ll start the rebuild in earnest. Stay tuned!
This is a device I picked up at Dayton 2025, mostly because it was cheap, and was being ignored because it was very dirty and wasn’t a desirable EICO unit.
This is how I found it:
And how it cleaned up. It was missing a knob so I pulled a gray PACO knob from my stock. Same knob, different color. Yeah…the selector control should have had a different color on it, that’s the way it is…
This one might have been a factory build. There are names on everything as if multiple people had their hands in this.
The tube compliment, save the eye, is all Precision or PACO branded. Either this has it’s OEM tubes from the original sale, or the owner replaced like-for-like.
The bottom of the unit is quite lovely. All those old Dumont capacitors, tho…
Notice all of the holes are grommeted for wires. Quite a different level than other manufacturers.
Even the eye tube is held in with a band made of wire.
But…
Fortunately, the chassis is return, but that still probably caused some noise.
Some basic checks on the unit before applying power…
That one is no good.
That one is ok. Kind of.
I’ll have to do some other checks with voltage later. I’m curious as to how well the Dumont capacitors held up.
There is one part, however, that needs to go, and that’s this across the line capacitor:
A new safety rated part was installed.
So…does it work? Sure does:
The eye tube is just about as dead as can be without being unusable, so this thing has a lot of hours on it. The gain control has a thunderstorm in it after multiple cleanings, so that will need to be replaced. Other than that, if may be a use as-is assuming the electrolytics don’t go popboom. I’ll still do some diagnosis on it to see if any resistors are way out of tolerance, or any of the other capacitors leak. Some will need to go, but the rest? Who knows.
This model seems to be somewhat unusual. The PACO Z-80, which looks like this one save it doesn’t have the chart diagram on the left side, appears to be identical. I can’t find a manual listed as the ST-22, so I’ll compare to the Z-80’s schematic and see if they are the same.
Stay tuned, this one will be on the bench maybe later this year if I have the time.
Another selenium-laden device. Why do I do this to myself?
The EICO 249 (And it’s small-form-factor cousin the 232) are VTVM units that offer both a P/P and RMS scale on their wonderfully large, but not parallax corrected face. It offers VDC, VAC, and Ohms (via an internal 1.5V battery.) These date to the 1960s, and as such, are probably one of the last-gasp devices that had both tubes and selenium rectifiers for the power supply.
The EICO 249 - The repair candidate
This unit came from the Cuyahoga Falls ARC hamfest along with the PACO G-30 that was on the bench earlier. It was the same vendor, so it has similar repairs inside - including replacement parts that don’t meet certain specs of the unit and will need to go if this wants to be in service.
The inside of the unit shows obvious work. It’s organized chaos.
Is that a polystyrene part in there?
The capacitors have all been replaced, as have some of the non-divider resistors. The orange parts near the bottom aren’t capacitors, but big resistors chained together to make some value. Front and center, however, is the 0.1µF @ 630V capacitor. This one is called out as 1000V in the specs, as this is an input blocking capacitor and may see a higher voltage on the input. The person doing the replacement just used a regular part without considering why that voltage was chosen. Of the most interest, however, are those blue resistors on the switch assembly. This is the voltage divider ladder, and we’ll come to that shortly.
The wiring seems to be thick and rubberized, and some is breaking down. It will need to be replaced as well, although not all of it.
The bottom of the chassis has the input jacks - the input was replaced with a BNC connector - the tubes, transformer, battery holder for the ohms function, as well as an enclosed 35mA selenium rectifier. This particular unit uses a split rail supply, so it’s going to be interesting seeing how it reacts with a modern silicon diode instead of this non-linear rectifier.
B+ total is about 150VDC between the positive and negative rails, so it’s not going to be difficult to work with. I question the use of a 150V filter capacitor in this circuit, however…those old paper caps did things differently and I’d probably chose a 200-250V part these days.
How does it perform? It’s…accurate-ish. Some scales are ok, others are not.
While the voltages were close after dialing in a test point with the adjustments on the side, they’re still off. That’s because the resistors in the divider ladder are all out of tolerance. These were 1% parts when new, and have simply drifted some over the years. That it’s not much is a testament to the quality of the parts themselves.
150kΩ
900kΩ
7MΩ
Others in the ladder were similar. They’re all bad. While 2% may not seem like much, it’s all of them in series with one another being off that causes drift and deviation. The unfortunate thing here is that most are unusual values and will require some chaining to replicate. Fortunately, these values can be made with standard values either in series or parallel.
The EICO 249 - The parts unit.
Setting that one aside for now, I have a second unit. This unit was purchased on fleebay, and the person packing it didn’t pack it well. The box was destroyed and the meter movement was damaged. That’s kind of a shame because this movement was the later, clear style. At least, I think it’s later…the date stamped was 1968. The golden color on the face is the glue from the original paper protector material, the paper apparently not having been removed until too late. There was still evidence of it under the nuts on the controls.
This one still has a lot of it’s original parts inside, with some old replacements. This one no longer had it’s selenium device, someone had put a diode in it without considering the effects of the much lower voltage drop on the power supply. I wonder how well that worked? I won’t know because it wasn’t functional when I got it, the meter being jammed to one side and coming unstuck broken.
This one is a mishmash of garbage and sadness.
These capacitors didn’t measure anywhere near the marked values.
Wiring was burnt. Almost every wire. Every. Single. One. Even the big 1000V capacitor in front of us is burnt.
How are the resistors in this one’s divider ladder?
About the same. There’s a couple in there that are right on, so…maybe I’ll take them off and see if they can be reused.
However…this one is not a unit that I can save, so it’s parts. Literally, a pile of parts.
But, all is not lost. The range switch may be a candidate for out-of-unit rebuild. I took some time to remove a hold-down mod the person put in for one of the contacts, and cleaned the metal rings. It seems to work ok, so I’m going to try it.
This thing may have a good chance of living again. Stay tuned!
The Simpson 715 is still somewhat of a mess, but I knew that going in. With almost any meter of this age, the resistors in the divider ladder are going to be way out of tolerance. While I didn’t measure any of them, voltage testing suggested that it starts at the bottom - so yes, literally all of them are probably bad.
I’ll revisit this device later, but right now I have other things I want to work on, and determining what resistors are going to be needed will require some thought.
This device didn’t have any real data about it, so I wasn’t sure what anything was supposed to be - plate voltages, tube voltages, etc. Fortunately, Simpson made this unit for Heathkit as the AV-3 kit, and Heathkit’s manual for the device was their normal, packed full book. All of the information was there and that helped considerably.
The original problem I was trying to correct.
The original issue with this device is that of no zero. While the device still doesn’t necessarily zero like I think it should, it’s much better than it was. I suspect there’s both some resistors bad in the unit itself, and that the meter movement may be a bit flaky from being beat around over the years.
As this was a piece given to me by a now-departed friend, I wanted to at least make sure it did something, and that it does. For the most part, I simply replaced all of the capacitors in the unit as they were old wax paper, bumblebee, and other assorted relics from a bygone age.
That was very straightforward and didn’t incur any issues.
The Selenium Rectifier
The selenium rectifier didn’t really present any challenges save that it stopped working midway through my testing of currents in the circuit. This required some guesstimations, which were incorrect. I was eventually able to determine was the device wanted after some physical experimentation.
That experimentation involved going back and making a new guess based on some other real-world devices, and getting it correct. I wound up with a 1.27K resistor replacing the selenium stack, bringing both of my B+ values to within 0.5V of the rated value.
I had posted about this device elsewhere, and had someone tell me that I was doing this wrong and making it harder than it needed to be. They read online that a selenium device only has this much drop, and that I should simply use that information to design a regulated supply, hope that helps.
No sir, that didn’t help. Sorry. But if you have a regulated 130VDC/120VDC power supply that fits in a selenium stack space, please let me know.
Final Thoughts
As I said earlier, this one isn’t done - especially if I want to actually use it. It’s a cute little device, so I’d like to - but the meter movement itself raises some concerns. I’ll definitely revisit this later, but for now - it’s mostly operational, and it’s good to sit around for a while.
Next up is an EICO 249 that has a similar issue, that of the divider ladder being bad. I have a spare unit and can rebuild the ladder assy out of parts, on the bench. Stay tuned for that one.
The Simpson 715 AC Voltmeter is finished. The selenium rectifier has been replaced, the capacitors are all new, and a few resistors have been changed out for good measure. So…does it work?
Well:
Yes…but no. It does work, but the resistors in the divider ladder are bad. I knew that going in. It also still has a hard time zeroing. Some checking suggests that pretty much everything in that ladder is out of tolerance, so if I want to use this device it’s going to need to go under the knife a second time.
I knew that going in, so it’s no surprise, and that will be a project all on it’s own - possibly. Stay tuned!
The selenium rectifier in the Simpson 715 isn’t going to replace itself, even though I wish it would. Therefore, it’s time to start the task of doing that. I started by making some assumptions about the current flows in each of the B+ sides…which were wrong. I knew that ~2mA flowed in the B-side of the power supply, but I had no idea what the A-side would be. This really didn’t make sense to me as there’s supposed to be 10V dropped across the B-side resistor, and 2mA would not do that with a 10k resistor - you’d need 20V dropped. Regardless, I left the 10K resistor in the B-side circuit for the first part of testing.
I originally started with my assumed parts, and quickly set those aside. I then went for a 1k resistor with a 200Ω pot, but found out that wasn’t enough. A 5k pot was chosen, and I was able to dial in the necessary 130VDC. I did the same thing with B-side, and after adjusting both pots I was able to come up with values.
After testing, I settled on 1.27k for the dropping resistor (selenium replacement) feeding the A-side, and 5.168k for the dropping resistor feeding the B-side. With that, I now know that (approximately):
Input voltage = 123VAC
Rectifier output = 173Vp, or (Vin*1.414)-Vd
If we want 130V on the A-Side B+, we need a drop of 33V across the resistor being used to simulate the selenium device. That means in 1.27k, abot 26mA is flowing:
I=(Vdrop/Rdrop) or .0259A=33V/1270Ω.
10 volts needs to be dropped by the B-side dropping resistor, so that means in 5.168k, about 2mA is flowing:
I=Vdrop2/Rdrop2) or 0.0019A=10V/5168Ω.
So we now know that the A side is requesting ~24mA and the B side is requesting about 2mA, for a total current flow of about 26mA. Note that I’m using approximat values because these will fluctuate slightly with line voltage and with the tubes themselves actually doing something.
The actual values were slightly different, 1270 and 5170, but I used what I had - a 5100 and a 68 got me close enough, and I had a 1k and 270Ω in stock. The testing of these parts resulted in some organized chaos…
For the diode, I chose a 1N4007, for the specific reason that’s what I have a lot of in my parts stock. Mounting required removing the old selenium rectifier which was just screwed down:
And building it’s replacement on a terminal strip. That j-hook didn’t turn out quite as nice as I’d liked, but it’s solid.
For the B-side B+, I used two smaller resistors since the power was negligible. They routed around the pilot lamp, but I would have liked to have higher power parts for this. Perhaps we’ll look into that later.
(Note the LED bulb in the pilot lamp socket. We’ll talk about that in a minute.)
B+ came right into the slots allotted for it.
Just on a whim, I tried a LED bulb instead of the #47 pilot. The circuit actually relies on the load from this part:
So it got replaced. A quick check, and on to the final checks…
I’ve had this big USB hub in my rack for some years. It’s mostly provided power for USB devices, but had a few actual USB devices that needed data plugged into it.
I came home last Friday to a “BEEP” - something rebooted. As I was putting things away from work, “BEEP.” Ok, something’s wrong. The hub was power cycling continually…well, the switching supply inside probably decided to go to lunch and not come back.
There’s not really that much inside of the thing - a power supply and some USB hub boards. Here’s the supply, it’s a fairly beefy 5V, 14A unit.
It claims to be made by UMEC:
The supply itself doesn’t look damaged, so it probably just finally popped. Maybe something died on one of the USB stacks…I don’t know.
I looked up the part number. It’s referenced - in China. I suppose I could put a different supply in there, or even an external brick…but do I really want to? Not really, I can just tap off the 5V line that’s on the system already running the few RPi units I have left. This will probably wind up put back together, in the “to go” pile.
When we left this project in February, the unit was working but the selenium rectifier quit before I could do much with it. I believe I had enough data to make an educated guess about what size resistor is needed to replace it. Seeing as how the SICo 76 is done, it’s time to put this one back on the bench.
The suspect part will eventually come out. I think I have enough room in there for a terminal strip for the new diode and resistor(s).
This is an EICO 950A Resistor-Capacitor Bridge. It offers the things you’d expect from such a device. It’s odd in that it slots in-between the 950 and 950B, which were traditional EICO silver-face units. Not this one:
This one features EICO’s colorful scheme, much like the 145 signal tracer I wrote about a couple of years ago. It has comparator and leakage functions in addition to the standard R-C measurements. Leakage is provided by a neon bulb under a pilot jewel in the upper right corner, an unusual bayonet bulb that someone replaced with a standard #47 pilot, probably because they didn’t realize that it wasn’t working because it only lights when you’re using it…not when you turn it on.
The cabinet has seen some use and abuse.
Rusty Bottoms is playing this show tonight:
Even the inside is rusty.
The chassis shows a similar amount of rust. This thing had a wet, hard life.
That aside…let’s look at the inside.
Jay Hooks makes a lot of appearances here.
The underside, however, is “Mah boi, what did they do to you?”
Everything has j-hooks. Everything. Parts. Wires. Everything. ~~Why???
Exactly what was the previous owner trying to resolve here? Was the thing on fire? It amazes me this thing worked at all, especially with those capcitors flying around with no insulation. With all the wires being j-hooked to other wires…it’s like the person just replaced everything for no reason than to replace it.
I’m going to take this challenge, but I need to get a schematic first. I’ll look for one…stay tuned. Hopefully we can make this device a bit happier.
This was an interesting chassis. Not because it’s anything unusual in what it does, but because it definitely shows it was the lower end of the spectrum. Heathkit, Knight, EICO - all of those showed some concern and care in how parts laid in the chassis. This one? Not so much. Things everywhere, parts flying from one side to the other, such a mish-mash of parts and styles and type. I’m still not sure if this one was factory built or kit built, seeing as how it has pop-rivets for everything mounted on the chassis. Seeing as how some of the parts interfere with others, it probably was kit-built.
What do I think about this device?
There wasn’t really anything different about this rebuild except that it required a lot more thought on how to place things, I couldn’t simply move strips around a little or remove parts without drilling them out. That was quite the pain, but it was worked through and eventually everything was re-installed.
I took the opportunity to use some new sleeving I’d purchased, since many of the parts had spacing far longer than anything you could purchase without special dispensation. These parts had a lead j-hooked on, and run to their connection points. I tried to stick with more modern parts like 1% films, good capacitors, and the like - except for the one used in the leakage circuit. This 1.8MΩ @ 2W was hard to find, so I just chose another carbon that was closer to the marked value. It’s not really like it matters, but it is what it is.
I couldn’t get the unit to do much of anything. The eye would close when a part was attached, so something was happening. I’m not sure if the instrument is just that low on the scale, or if the parts I have are bad to the point of being unable to be tested by this device. Regardless, it didn’t seem to do much, and that’s pretty much what I expected. This wasn’t about an accurate instrument, it was about the rebuild process.
That’s all. This is just a footnote shelf queen. Next up is the Simpson 715, finishing up the rectifier section. After that, an EICO VTVM finally gets it’s time on the bench, and perhaps an EICO 950A - assuming I can find schematics for it because that one is a mess. Stay tuned!
